The duty of humans to stop animal abuse

Francione Place of Publication: Another, competing, basis is based on the theory of utilitarianism — the outright rejection of rights for all species and instead advocacy for equal consideration. This is the view espoused by Peter Singer, author of Animal Liberation. In this article, Professor Francione compares animal rights with utilitarianism, discussing the pros and cons of each I.

The duty of humans to stop animal abuse

Royal Cock Pit, Microcosm of London, PlateCock fighting remained a Christian favourite sport for even longer than other forms of animal cruelty. Throughout western Europe cocks were bred for fighting each other.

The birds, referred to as gamecocks, are specially bred birds, selected for stamina and strength. The comb and wattle are cut off in order to remove anatomical vulnerabilities similar to the traditional practice of docking a dog's tail and ears.

Cocks possess congenital aggression toward all males of the same species. As a blood sport Cockfighting is regulated in many countries, but still defended as an "age old sport"[ with cultural and religious relevance.

Cock fighting was made illegal in Louisiana as late as Special spurs made of metal and designed to act like knives are bound to the feet of gamebirds to supplement their own natural smaller and less damaging spurs and cause major physical damage to the other cock.

Cock Throwing Cock throwing, also known as cock-shying or throwing at cocks, was a blood sport widely practised in England until the 19th century.


A cockerel was held or tied to a post, and people took turns throwing coksteles special weighted sticks at the bird until it died. Cock throwing was traditionally associated with the Christian activities of Shrove Tuesday.

It was a popular pastime with people of all classes, especially with children. Sir Thomas More, now a Roman Catholic saint, referred to his skill in casting a cokstele as a boy. Cock throwing's popularity waned in England during the secular Enlightenment, as social values changed and animal welfare became a concern.

William Hogarth depicted cock throwing as a barbarous activity, the first stage in a "slippery slope" in The Four Stages of Cruelty, Children Torturing Animals detail Cock throwing was commonly practiced at public and grammar schools, including Church schools, as elsewhere, on Shrove Tuesday.

If the bird had its legs broken or was lamed during the event, it was sometimes supported with sticks in order to prolong the "sport". The cock was also sometimes placed inside an earthenware jar to prevent it from moving.

Variations on the theme included goose quailing or squailingwhen a goose was substituted, and cock thrashing or cock whipping, which involved a cock being placed in a pit where the blindfolded participants would attempt to hit it with their sticks.

Wellington represented as the cock in this cartoon depicting cock throwing from around the s By the early 19th century, as Christianity started to lose influence, the tradition declined rapidly, lingering into the s.

In some places, especially Christian schools, bows and arrows were used instead of coksteles. Shooting at cockerels was abolished at Manchester Grammar School in Tossing Fox tossing was a popular competitive blood sport in parts of Europe in the 17th and 18th centuries, which involved throwing live foxes or cats, dogs and or other animals high into the air.

It was practiced by members of the aristocracy in an enclosed piece of ground often a courtyard, using slings with a person on each end to catapult the animal upwards. The outcome for the tossed animals was invariably fatal, one way or another.

The duty of humans to stop animal abuse

They would be clubbed to death if they did not die of their fall injuries. You can see some foxes i the air, some injured on the ground. Fox tossing would take place within a circle of canvas screens in the open or by using the courtyard of a castle or palace.

Pairs of people would stand six to seven and a half metres 20 to 25 feet apart, holding the ends of a sling laid flat on the ground. An animal such as a fox would then be released from a cage and driven with a whip through the arena, across the slings. As it crossed a sling the participants pulled hard on the ends, throwing the animal high into the air.

Those who slung a fox the highest, or slung the most foxes would win. German aristocrats engaged in fox tossing or Fuchsprellen lit. Part of the fun was that a fox might land on the throwers, as has happened here in the bottom left of the illustration.

Augustus II the Strong, the Christian King of Poland and Elector of Saxony, held a tossing contest in Dresden at which foxes, hares, 34 badgers and 21 wildcats were tossed and killed. Other rulers also participated in the sport. The Swedish envoy Esaias Pufendorf, witnessing a fox-tossing contest held in Vienna in Marchnoted in his diary seeing the Holy Roman Emperor Leopold I joining the court dwarfs and boys in clubbing to death the injured animals.Cruelty to animals, also called animal abuse, animal neglect or animal cruelty, is the infliction by omission (animal neglect) or by commission by humans of suffering or harm upon any non-human.

More narrowly, it can be the causing of harm or suffering for specific achievement, such as killing animals for food or for their fur; opinions differ about the extent of cruelty associated with a.

Animal Cruelty Quotes (74 quotes)

If you’re already a “cat person”, you don’t need to be convinced that a cat or kitten makes a great pet! But anyone can learn to love cats, and for modern lifestyles, choosing to adopt a cat or kitten is a relatively low maintenance pet choice, particularly if you do not have a large outdoor area.

Step 4: Help Prevent Animal Abuse The key to preventing neglect is education. Many owners just aren’t aware of how important affection is to a pet or even that a puppy can outgrow her collar.

We have a moral duty to stop abusing other animal species. They aren't really that different from us humans. Vertebrates share much of our DNA and our capacity for thought, feelings, emotions.

Summary: Animal “rights” is of course not the only philosophical basis for extending legal protections to animals.

The duty of humans to stop animal abuse

Another, competing, basis is based on the theory of utilitarianism – the outright rejection of rights for all species and instead advocacy for equal consideration.

The biggest cover-up of all time is the fact that there is a civilization of people living in the center of Earth, whose civilization's name is known as "Agartha" (variations: 'Agharta' & 'Aghartha').

Human rights are animal rights!