In accordance with Article 6 of the Agreement, UNTAC will exercise the powers necessary to ensure the implementation of this Agreement, including those relating to the organization and conduct of free and fair elections and the relevant aspects of the administration of Cambodia.
Or know another veteran, service member, or military spouse who is? Get started at Hirepurpose. The father of my country wants me to do my civic duty and vote. The poster contains the seeds of an unresolved paradox for military personnel: We are citizens with a responsibility to engage in the national political process, yet we must moderate our engagement to avoid marrying military power with a political party.
New controversies, old guidelines A recent blip on the news radar illustrates how knotty this paradox is — though if you blinked, you might have missed it. After Political neutrality domestic tumult ofpolitical expression among military leaders needs to be re-surveyed.
Where must civic engagement yield to military professionalism? What is acceptable Political neutrality expression? The answers are important, because they undergird the massive public trust the military currently enjoys. But recently retired service members, particularly flag officers, are a different case.
And those norms seem to be shifting in recent years. The decay of servant leadership Junior officers and enlisted personnel take their cues from more senior service members, and when strong opinions are expressed in front of soldiers, they leave a mark.
They can affect morale and undermine faith in our political process. The erosion of these norms begins innocuously, unfolds slowlyand hardly attracts our attention. Flagrant political overtures are simple enough to spot and hold in check.
But the terrain grows far more hazardous as those of us on active duty grow more vocal. Desegregation once had its vocal opponents in the military, as did permitting women in in ground combaton submarinesand in fighter jetsalong with allowing openly gay and transgender service members.
And, of course, West Point graduate 2nd Lt. But recently, there is a palpable change in the political ecosphere. Why does the present moment seem different? Why does it seem harder than in the past to keep our politics to ourselves in the military? I suggest that there are two trends at play here.
First, we are just as affected as the rest of the U. Nearly every difference of opinion seems cast in the language of good versus evil, and so we are more compelled to speak out for what each of us believes is the good.
Second, we have developed an unhealthy separateness from the civilian world that manifests as self-righteousness. Being honest brokers So much of what we value in our country exists primarily in the abstract, but feels real nonetheless.
No easy chart exists to help us plot a course between civic engagement and dangerous politicking. The UCMJ and our usual norms only carry us so far; we are left to our own best judgment to negotiate the gray areas.
When in doubt, the spirit of the U.Republican voters overwhelmingly like net neutrality.
The likely GOP candidates for president do not. According to a raft of recent n ational polls, Republican voters approve of government action. The newspaper is known for its political neutrality. The promise made by social media platforms—of openness, neutrality, meritocracy, and community—remains powerful and seductive, resonating deeply with the ideals of network culture and a truly democratic information society.
Net neutrality is the principle that Internet service providers treat all data on the Internet equally, and not discriminate or charge differently by user, content, website, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or method of communication. For instance, under these principles, internet service providers are unable to intentionally block, slow down or charge money for specific.
Mar 01, · The dramatic rise of the independent voter is one of the popular narratives of our tumultuous political times, not just in California but nationally. It’s also highly misleading.
Buttressed by robust public support, Jefferson sought to implement policies that reflected his own political ideology.
He worked to reduce taxes and cut the government’s budget, believing that this would expand the economic opportunities of free Americans. Democrat leaders in New York and other pro-abortion states seem to forget that.
It is not enough that pro-life states legislatively and politically carry the weight in abolishing abortion for the rest of the country.